ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Comparison of sexual function outcomes after vNOTES and laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare postoperative sexual function outcomes following vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) and laparoscopic tubal sterilization (LTS). Material and Methods: This retrospective comparative cohort analysis included 64 women with prospectively collected routine clinical data who underwent permanent surgical sterilization using vNOTES ( Results: After adjustment for baseline scores, the 6-month dyspareunia VAS score was significantly higher in the vNOTES group than in the LTS group (AMD, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.66; unadjusted Conclusion: vNOTES was associated with higher dyspareunia scores and lower satisfaction-domain scores at 6 months; however, no significant between-group differences were observed in total FSFI or QSES scores. These findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the retrospective, nonrandomized design and small sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.