ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Novel echocardiographic tools for predicting a good response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite significant progress in new echocardiographic techniques, the role of echocardiography in qualifying patients for cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) remains limited solely to the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This review aims to present the current knowledge on new echocardiographic methods that may be useful in predicting the response to resynchronization. Recent advances in speckle-tracking echocardiography (STE) have introduced several promising parameters. Measures such as global longitudinal strain, mechanical dispersion, and various indices of mechanical dyssynchrony, including those derived from myocardial work, have shown growing evidence of their utility in identifying patients more likely to benefit from CRT. Increasing data support the use of these deformation-based techniques as complementary tools to traditional LVEF assessment, offering a more precise characterization of left ventricular mechanics and potentially improving patient selection. This paper aims to demonstrate how new echocardiographic techniques allow for the evaluation of relevant left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony, and to highlight their current and emerging value in the clinical assessment and management of heart failure patients being considered for CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.