Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42712647›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion2026

Attrition Rates in Multiple Myeloma - A Report from indian Patients at A Tertiary Cancer Center.

Dhyey Mishra, Aditya Nair, Jash Shah, Saswata Saha, Lingraj Nayak, Alok Shetty, Prashant Tembhare, Ajmat Khan, Nishant Jindal, Sumeet Mirgh and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Dhyey MishraSeth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Parel India.ORCID 0009-0006-7143-5628
Aditya NairSeth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Parel India.
Jash ShahSeth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Parel India.
Saswata SahaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Lingraj NayakDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Alok ShettyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Prashant TembhareDepartment of Hemato-pathology, Advanced Centre for Training, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, NaviMumbai India.
Ajmat KhanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Nishant JindalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sumeet MirghDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Anant GokarnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sachin PunatarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sweta RajpalDepartment of Hemato-pathology, Advanced Centre for Training, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, NaviMumbai India.
Gaurav ChatterjeeDepartment of Hemato-pathology, Advanced Centre for Training, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, NaviMumbai India.
Nikhil PatkarDepartment of Hemato-pathology, Advanced Centre for Training, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, NaviMumbai India.
Papagudi SubramanianDepartment of Hemato-pathology, Advanced Centre for Training, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, NaviMumbai India.
Dhanalaxmi ShettyDepartment of Cancer Cytogenetics, Advanced Centre for Training, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, NaviMumbai India.
Hemani JainDepartment of Cancer Cytogenetics, Advanced Centre for Training, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, NaviMumbai India.
Vasundhara PatilDepartment of Radiodiagnosis,Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Sayak ChoudharyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Ameya PuranikDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Hasmukh JainDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Manju SengarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Navin KhattryDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
Bhausaheb BagalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.ORCID 0000-0001-9754-0182

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of its relapsing-remitting nature, patients with multiple myeloma [1,2] require extended therapy with chemotherapy, novel agents, autologous stem cell transplants (ASCT), monoclonal antibodies and/or immune therapies for optimal outcomes. Attrition during treatment can negatively impact long-term outcomes and factors influencing the same may be important clues to achieve optimal patient outcomes. This study aims to examine attrition rates and the factors influencing them.We analysed 244 consecutive newly diagnosed patients of multiple myeloma from January 2017 to December 2017 registered at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai. The patient factors such as age, comorbidities, clinical and laboratory evaluations were recorded along with the lines of therapy (LOTs) received, best response and use of ASCT. Attrition was defined as failure to receive a subsequent line of therapy despite progression of the disease or death from disease according to similar stringent definitions used in similar studies elsewhere. Factors influencing attrition were analyzed using the chi-square test for categorical variables, and either the t-test or logistic regression for continuous variables. An odds ratio greater than 1 and a p-value less than 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. The median age of study cohort was 57.11 years, with 66.4% being male. CRAB (Hypercalcemia, renal dysfunction, anemia, bony lesion) features were noted in most patients with following frequencies: 42 (17.3%) patients with hypercalcemia, 70 (28.9%)-renal dysfunction, 15 (6.2%) of the patients received dialysis,139 (56.9%) patients had anaemia at presentation and 213 (87.2%) patients had bony lesions. R-ISS was available for 199 patients with 19 (9.5%), 128 (64.3%) and 45 (22.6%) of them having R-ISS I, II, and III respectively. 26.2% patients had high-risk cytogenetics (as per the IMWG consensus criteria 2016) at presentation. The most common 1st line therapy given was bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone combination (77.5% of patients). 8.2% of patients had stem cell transplants done & 22.63% patients had received maintenance post first-line therapy. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 3.337 years and 5.043 (Range = 4.143-5.943) years respectively.The median OS in the attrited group was 2.87 years (Range 2.37-3.37 years) while those with attrition to second line therapy showed even poorer median OS of 1.08 years (Range 0.67-1.49 years). The attrition rates for individual lines of therapy were 28.6% for the second LOT, 34.2% for the 3rd LOT, and 45.3% for the subsequent LOTs. The overall attrition rate at the end of follow up was 62.9% (141 patients). Among the factors analysed for attrition, on univariate analysis higher age, ECOG scores of 2 or more, renal dysfunction at presentation, ISS stage 3, and not receiving ASCT showed a significantly higher likelihood of attrition. On multivariate analysis (Overall regression model significant with

Indexed as

Attrition ratesIndian cohortMultiple myelomaNewly diagnosed multiple myelomaOverall survivalReal world dataTreatment outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42712647
PMCPMC13550296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.