ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2026
Clinical efficacy and putative analgesic mechanism of heat-sensitive moxibustion for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a single-arm before-after study based on the brain-gut-immune axis.
Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Growing evidence implicates brain-gut-immune axis dysregulation in the pathogenesis and perpetuation of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Heat-sensitive moxibustion (HSM), a refined form of traditional suspended moxibustion that targets heat-sensitized acupoints, has demonstrated preliminary analgesic efficacy, but its mechanisms through the brain-gut-immune axis remain unexplored. Objective: To describe the clinical changes following HSM in patients with CNLBP and to explore its putative analgesic mechanism in relation to modulation of the brain-gut-immune axis, as assessed by nine serum biomarkers spanning neuroendocrine (β-endorphin, cortisol), intestinal barrier (lipopolysaccharide, D-lactate), gut-brain serotonergic signaling (5-hydroxytryptamine), and immune-inflammatory (interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-α, interleukin-10, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) dimensions. Methods: This single-arm, pre-post exploratory study enrolled 204 eligible CNLBP patients who received 20 sessions of HSM over four weeks. Primary outcomes were the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Secondary outcomes included the Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the nine-biomarker panel. Blood samples were collected at baseline and post-treatment. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for pre-post comparisons. Treatment responders ( ≥ 50% VAS reduction) and non-responders were compared, and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of treatment response. Results: Of 204 enrolled patients, 186 completed the study (attrition rate, 8.8%). VAS scores decreased significantly after treatment (5.87 ± 1.38 vs. 2.21 ± 1.32; Conclusion: Following HSM, CNLBP patients showed clinically meaningful pain relief and functional improvement. These uncontrolled observations are consistent with, but cannot confirm, a putative analgesic mechanism involving four-dimensional modulation of the brain-gut-immune axis: central endogenous opioid activation, intestinal barrier restoration, gut-brain serotonergic signaling regulation, and peripheral immune rebalancing. Baseline heat-sensitization intensity, pain severity, and intestinal permeability may serve as potential predictors of treatment response. As a single-arm study without a control group, these findings establish association and biological plausibility rather than causal efficacy, and warrant confirmation in a randomized controlled trial with a sham-moxibustion comparator.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.