ArticleFood chemistry: X2026
Micro-aqueous extraction of skipjack tuna head oil: A green strategy for maximizing yield while minimizing lipid oxidation and fishy Odor.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated micro-aqueous extraction (MAE) as a green strategy for recovering oil from skipjack tuna heads, comparing it with enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction (EAE) and heat extraction (HE). MAE achieved a maximum extraction yield of 69.7% at an oil volume fraction of 25%, significantly surpassing EAE (53.2%) and HE (39.1%), respectively. MAE oil exhibited superior quality with lower acid value, peroxide value, and malondialdehyde content, while retaining the highest polyunsaturated fatty acid content (47.57%) rich in EPA and DHA. Comprehensive volatile analysis by GC-MS and GC-IMS revealed significantly lower abundances of oxidation-derived volatiles in MAE oil, particularly key fishy-odor compounds, which were substantially reduced or absent relative to EAE and HE oils. Multivariate statistical analysis further confirmed distinct clustering of MAE oil based on its lower oxidation marker levels. These findings demonstrate that MAE effectively maximizes yield from low-fat tuna by-products while preserving nutritional value and minimizing fishy odor formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.