ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Perioperative management for invasive brain-computer interface implantation under surgical navigation in a patient with traumatic spinal cord injury: a case report.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The clinical application of invasive brain-computer interface combined with surgical navigation in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury remains limited, and there is a lack of a standardized perioperative nursing cooperation strategy. This paper summarized the intraoperative cooperation and nursing experience from a single case, aim to provide a reference for clinical practice. Case summary: Preoperatively, the patient presented with a muscle strength of grade 4 in both forearms and upper arms, and grade 0 in both hands. Surgical navigation-assisted invasive brain-computer interface implantation was planned. The operation was successfully completed, and device activation was performed on August 13, 2025. At the 6-month follow-up, an assessment using the Upper Extremity Motor Score indicated that the patient achieved a grip score of 6 points for the left hand and 4 points for the right hand, with total scores of 11 points for the left hand and 8 points for the right hand, respectively. Improvement in bilateral upper limb motor function was observed. The patient regained voluntary motor function, and the complete paralysis was alleviated. No adverse events occurred during the hospitalization and follow-up period, and the patient and his family members reported a high level of satisfaction. Conclusion: This paper summarized the perioperative care experience of a patient with traumatic spinal cord injury who underwent an invasive brain-computer interface implantation under surgical navigation. During the perioperative period, refined nursing cooperation was implemented through establishing a multidisciplinary team, conducting comprehensive preoperative preparations, precisely coordinating with surgical navigation, strictly preventing surgical site infections, standardizing postoperative monitoring, and enhancing post-discharge follow-up. The precise perioperative nursing plan is scientifically sound and clinically feasible, providing a practical foundation for the future implementation of perioperative nursing strategies for similar surgical procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.