ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Evaluating air cleaner effectiveness in schools: a comprehensive review and protocol of a cluster-randomized controlled trial of physicochemical and microbial markers.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07479420 (Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of Air Cleaning Technologies on Microbial and Physicochemical Markers in Primary School Classrooms), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial Assessing the Impact of Air Cleaning Technologies on Microbial and Physicochemical Markers in Primary School Classrooms
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In school environments, characterized by high occupancy and prolonged exposure, airborne contaminants pose risks to respiratory health and learning outcomes. Portable air cleaners (PACs) are increasingly considered as a supplement to ventilation, yet field-based evidence remains heterogeneous, with few randomized trials and limited data on microbial agents. Here, we describe the design and methodology of a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial evaluating PAC effectiveness in Dutch primary school classrooms. The study included 180 classrooms across 29 primary schools, with classrooms clustered within schools and randomized to HEPA-filter PACs, ionization/plasma PACs, or no PACs. The design incorporated a three-week baseline or two-week post-intervention control period, and three repeated three-week intervention periods in the main phase, totaling up to 14 weeks per school. PACs were pre-tested under standardized laboratory conditions, screened for safety, and operated at comparable clean air delivery rates (CADR). Airborne dust was collected using electrostatic dust fall collectors (EDCs) and analyzed for bacterial markers representing common human microbiome constituents, a general bacterial indicator, and viral markers for seasonal infections. In 12 classrooms, active air sampling was conducted alongside EDCs to validate and quantify passive measurements. Continuous monitoring of particulate matter (PM₁₀, PM₄, PM₂.₅, PM₁), CO₂, air temperature, relative humidity, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed. Classroom-level absenteeism and parent-reported respiratory symptoms were collected retrospectively. Weekly national infectious-disease surveillance and outdoor PM and NO₂ data will contextualize indoor measurements and health outcomes. Hierarchical mixed-effects models accounting for school, cluster, and classroom structure will analyze microbial outcomes. Bayesian hierarchical models may be applied for values outside the quantifiable range. By integrating comprehensive indoor air quality assessment with a dual-control design distinguishing pre-existing classroom differences from temporal trends, this registered trial (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07479420; 6 March 2026) provides a rigorous framework to evaluate PACs under real-world classroom conditions and support evidence-informed strategies to improve classroom indoor air quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.