ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Predicting hyperopic reserve in children based on school-based vision programs with ensemble learning.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a predictive model based on school-based vision screening programs for evaluating hyperopic reserve status in children aged 5-10 years. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 8,035 students aged 5-10 years from senior kindergarten and primary school in Guangdong Province, China. Participants underwent ocular biometric measurements, autorefraction, and questionnaire assessment before cycloplegia, after which autorefraction was repeated. An ensemble learning model was constructed to predict low hyperopic reserve (LHR), a refractive status below age-appropriate norms but not yet myopic, using NCR ocular parameters and questionnaire data. Model performance was evaluated and compared through nested 5-fold cross-validation. Sensitivity and robustness analyses were conducted to verify the comprehensive model performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was utilized to interpret feature contributions and model logic. Results: On the test set, the ensemble learning model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.807, an accuracy of 0.737, and a precision of 0.747, outperforming all the single machine learning models. Compared to the direct NCR-based assessment and the +0.50 D / +0.75 D fixed-offset benchmarks (accuracy = 0.614-0.669, precision = 0.593-0.683), the ensemble learning model improved accuracy by 0.068-0.123 and precision by 0.064-0.154. SHAP analysis identified axial length to corneal radius ratio (SHAP value = 0.652), spherical equivalent (SHAP value = 0.514), and school type (SHAP value = 0.312) as the most three important predictors. Conclusions and Relevance: The proposed ensemble learning model offers a noncycloplegic, convenient approach for school-based vision programs to predict LHR in children aged 5-10 years. This model and its risk-assessment tool may support existing school-based vision programs in preserving children's hyperopic reserve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.