ArticleFrontiers in sociology2026
When "lying flat" goes quiet: active and passive pathways linking "Tang Ping" suppression to displaced voice and hidden disengagement.
Article in Frontiers in sociology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tang Ping (, TP), or "lying flat," has emerged among Chinese youth as an embedded response to overwork, involution, blocked mobility, and declining confidence that sustained effort will secure adult roles and material stability. This Perspective asks what may happen when institutions and platforms restrict the visibility, legitimacy, or circulation of TP expression without changing the pressures that made it meaningful. It introduces the Tang Ping Differentiated Pathways Framework (TP-DPF), a conceptual model of function-contingent responses to suppression. The framework distinguishes three manifestations of TP: discourse, self-identification, and practice. Its originality lies in combining this manifestation-function distinction with function-contingent divergence after suppression. When TP expression serves active boundary-setting and retains agency, suppression may evoke autonomy-threat appraisal, freedom-restoration motivation, and displaced voice through coded, private, anonymous, or symbolic expression. When TP expression reflects passive, despair-driven withdrawal and low efficacy, suppression may instead reinforce voice-futility appraisal, futility-based withholding, and intensified hidden disengagement. Self-determination theory differentiates the two functions; psychological reactance theory explains the active pathway; and voice-and-silence theory explains the passive pathway. Chinese relational obligations, moralized striving, class-linked resources, and state-platform visibility governance may condition discourse-practice correspondence and post-suppression pathways. The article specifies construct definitions, multilevel boundary conditions, operational propositions, sampling and measurement strategies, instruments, and analytical designs. It concludes cautiously that reduced public TP discourse by itself cannot demonstrate motivational recovery because expression may diverge from practice, active voice may be displaced, and passive withdrawal may deepen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.