ArticleDiscover sustainability2026
A framework for assessing urban carrying capacity and its impact on water and sanitation service delivery in a hill city.
Article in Discover sustainability, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In March 2021, the National Green Tribunal of India (NGT), directed states to assess the carrying capacities of Indian hill cities to balance tourism and ecological sustainability. This mandate was the first stepping stone to restrict unplanned development and regulate tourist influx that can be sustained by the cities. Nainital, a major tourist destination in Uttarakhand, faces immense pressure on its urban infrastructure and service delivery, especially in the context of water and sanitation, due to the rising tourist influx. However, India lacks a national-level framework for assessing and managing the carrying capacity of the urban environment. This study, conducted by National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), develops a comprehensive framework for assessing carrying capacity by using key indicators, correction factor-based calculations, and temporal analysis. A mixed-method approach, including a systematic literature review, key informant interviews (KIIs), and focus group discussions (FGDs), was employed. According to the URDPFI Guidelines, while the city could theoretically accommodate 8,34,184 persons per day based on physical carrying capacity, the number reduced to 149,230 based on real carrying capacity, while the effective carrying capacity is limited to approximately 8,422 due to resource and service delivery constraints. The research offers policymakers a framework for sustainable water and sanitation management, aiding urban planning in ecologically sensitive areas. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02959-7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.