Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42712439›Full record

ArticleDiscover sustainability2026

A framework for assessing urban carrying capacity and its impact on water and sanitation service delivery in a hill city.

Vanshika Bajaj, Tanya Ahmed, Anant Mitra, Shantanu Padhi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Discover sustainability, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vanshika BajajNational Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), Delhi, India.
Tanya AhmedNational Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), Delhi, India.
Anant MitraNational Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), Delhi, India.
Shantanu PadhiNational Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In March 2021, the National Green Tribunal of India (NGT), directed states to assess the carrying capacities of Indian hill cities to balance tourism and ecological sustainability. This mandate was the first stepping stone to restrict unplanned development and regulate tourist influx that can be sustained by the cities. Nainital, a major tourist destination in Uttarakhand, faces immense pressure on its urban infrastructure and service delivery, especially in the context of water and sanitation, due to the rising tourist influx. However, India lacks a national-level framework for assessing and managing the carrying capacity of the urban environment. This study, conducted by National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), develops a comprehensive framework for assessing carrying capacity by using key indicators, correction factor-based calculations, and temporal analysis. A mixed-method approach, including a systematic literature review, key informant interviews (KIIs), and focus group discussions (FGDs), was employed. According to the URDPFI Guidelines, while the city could theoretically accommodate 8,34,184 persons per day based on physical carrying capacity, the number reduced to 149,230 based on real carrying capacity, while the effective carrying capacity is limited to approximately 8,422 due to resource and service delivery constraints. The research offers policymakers a framework for sustainable water and sanitation management, aiding urban planning in ecologically sensitive areas. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02959-7.

Indexed as

Carrying capacitySanitationTourismWastewaterWater

Identifiers

PMID42712439
PMCPMC13550081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.