ArticleFrontiers in neurology2026
Discovery and validation of GNA12
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early-onset preeclampsia (EOPE) is a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and is characterized by placental dysfunction, systemic endothelial injury, and hypertensive vascular stress. Because hypertensive disorders of pregnancy may also signal later maternal cardiovascular and cerebrovascular vulnerability, effective biomarkers for first-trimester risk assessment remain clinically important. Extrachromosomal circular DNA (eccDNA), a stable form of circulating cell-free DNA, has emerged as a potential source of disease-associated biomarkers. This study aimed to characterize first-trimester plasma eccDNA alterations associated with subsequent EOPE and to identify and validate a candidate circulating eccDNA marker for early risk assessment. Methods: A two-stage nested case-control study was conducted within a prospective birth cohort. In the discovery stage, plasma samples collected at 11-13 weeks of gestation from 5 women who subsequently developed EOPE and 5 matched normotensive controls were profiled by Circle-Seq to characterize genome-wide eccDNA alterations. Candidate eccDNAs were prioritized through differential abundance analysis and were further confirmed by outward PCR and Sanger sequencing. In the validation stage, the candidate selected marker was quantified by junction-specific qPCR in an independent cohort of 109 EOPE cases and 109 controls. Its potential predictive value was further evaluated alone and in combination with routine first-trimester clinical variables. Results: In the exploratory discovery analysis, 410 nominally differentially abundant candidate eccDNAs were identified as a hypothesis-generating pool. Among these, GNA12 Conclusion: First-trimester plasma eccDNA profiling revealed distinct alterations associated with subsequent EOPE, from which GNA12
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.