ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Distinct clinical phenotypes in acute heart failure identified by unsupervised clustering: a nationwide registry-based study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute heart failure (AHF) is a highly heterogeneous clinical syndrome, posing challenges for risk stratification and management. Phenotype-based classification using unsupervised clustering may provide insights beyond conventional approaches. Methods: We analyzed a nationwide, prospective, multicenter registry of patients hospitalized with AHF. Baseline demographic characteristics, clinical variables, laboratory findings, and echocardiographic parameters obtained at index hospitalization were used for unsupervised clustering. K-means clustering was applied, and the optimal number of clusters was determined based on internal validation metrics and clinical interpretability. Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes were compared across clusters. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between cluster membership and clinical outcomes. Results: A total of 7,351 patients were classified into five distinct clinical phenotypes. The clusters demonstrated marked differences in baseline characteristics, comorbidity burden, hemodynamic profiles, and cardiac function. Treatment patterns, including guideline-directed medical therapy and supportive interventions, varied significantly across clusters. During follow-up, all-cause mortality differed significantly among clusters ( Conclusion: In this large, nationwide cohort of patients with AHF, unsupervised clustering identified five clinically distinct phenotypes with significantly different characteristics, management patterns, and outcomes. These findings support the clinical relevance of phenotype-based classification and highlight its potential to enhance risk stratification and inform more personalized management strategies in AHF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.