Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42712407›Full record

ArticleBMJ digital health & AI2025

Retrospective evaluation of a machine learning model to facilitate pharmacogenetic testing.

Adam Paul Yan, Santiago Eduardo Arciniegas, Iris Cohn, Ruud H J Verstegen, Winnie Seto, Shawna Silver, Lin Lawrence Guo, Jiro Inoue, Agata Wolochacz, Karim Jessa and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ digital health & AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adam Paul YanDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Santiago Eduardo ArciniegasProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Iris CohnDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruud H J VerstegenDivision of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Winnie SetoProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shawna SilverDivision of Pediatric Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lin Lawrence GuoProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jiro InoueProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Agata WolochaczProgram in Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Karim JessaInformation Management Technology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
George TomlinsonDepartment of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lillian SungDivision of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0951-3091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To describe the epidemiology of nine medications with pharmacogenetic guidance (targeted medications) and frequency of pharmacogenetic testing; and to develop a retrospective machine learning (ML) model to predict prescription of targeted medications within 3 and 6 months of admission. Methods and Analysis: For the epidemiology aim, the cohort included patients prescribed at least one targeted medication. Pharmacogenetic testing rates were determined before and after first targeted medication prescription. For the ML aim, the cohort included all inpatient admissions. Outcome was receipt of a targeted medication within 3 or 6 months. Models were trained using L2-regularised logistic regression and two gradient boosting machine frameworks (LightGBM and XGBoost). Data were temporally split into training (80%), validation (10%) and test (10%) sets. Results: For the epidemiology cohort, 4520 patients were prescribed at least one targeted medication. Only 4.3% (n=194) had pharmacogenetic testing performed at any point, and only 1.0% (n=44) completed testing before the first prescription. For the ML cohort, 57 368 admissions were included. LightGBM was the best-performing ML model. For the prediction of prescription of a targeted medication at 3 and 6 months, area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was 0.926 (95% CI 0.911 to 0.939) and 0.922 (95% CI 0.911 to 0.932), respectively. Area under the precision recall curves was 0.477 (95% CI 0.462 to 0.495) and 0.450 (95% CI 0.411 to 0.494), respectively. Conclusion: Only 1% of patients receiving a targeted medication had pharmacogenetic testing before the medication order. We developed an ML model with acceptable performance to predict targeted medication administration with the goal of facilitating earlier pharmacogenomic testing.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceElectronic Health RecordsMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42712407
PMCPMC13528390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.