SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2026
Effects of resistance training combined with creatine supplementation on muscle strength, physical function, and muscle mass in older adults: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To systematically evaluate the additional effects of creatine supplementation combined with resistance training, compared with resistance training alone, on muscle strength, muscle mass and physical function in older adults. Methods: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched from inception to 20 May 2026. Randomized controlled trials enrolling older adults aged 60 years and older and comparing creatine supplementation plus resistance training with resistance training alone or placebo plus resistance training were included. Three-level random-effects meta-analyses were conducted using the metafor package in R, allowing multiple correlated effect sizes from the same study to be retained while accounting for their statistical dependence. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBUST-RCT tool, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using the GRADE approach. Results: Eleven randomized controlled trials were included. Three-level meta-analysis showed that creatine supplementation combined with resistance training significantly improved muscle strength compared with resistance training alone, although the effect size was small (g = 0.31, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.45); the certainty of evidence for this outcome was moderate. The pooled effects on muscle mass (g = 0.35, 95% CI -0.09 to 0.78) and physical function (g = 0.47, 95% CI -0.08 to 1.03; Conclusion: In generally healthy older adults, creatine supplementation may serve as an adjunct to resistance training for modest improvements in muscle strength. Its additional effects on muscle mass and physical function remain uncertain. These findings should not be directly extrapolated to frail, sarcopenic or functionally limited older adults. Larger, well-reported randomized controlled trials are needed in these higher-risk older adult populations. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/, identifier CRD420261417231.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.