Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42712393›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026

Beyond the sugar tax: public acceptability of a comprehensive food policy bundle in urban Ghana.

Kasim Abdulai, Emil Kafui Amenu, Portia Bangkuu, Ivan Addae-Mensah, Francis Adane, Abass Daudi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kasim AbdulaiTranslational Nutrition Research Group, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Emil Kafui AmenuTranslational Nutrition Research Group, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Portia BangkuuTranslational Nutrition Research Group, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Ivan Addae-MensahTranslational Nutrition Research Group, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast, Ghana.
Francis AdaneDepartment of Health Policy, Planning and Management, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Abass DaudiTamale Teaching Hospital, Tamale, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The escalating burden of diet-related non-communicable diseases in Ghana has prompted the government to implement a 20% excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages through the Excise Duty (Amendment) Act 1108 of 2023. While fiscal measures have garnered significant advocacy, public health experts emphasize the need for a "double-duty" policy bundle, including food marketing restrictions, front-of-pack warning labeling, and public food procurement policies. The problem is that public support for this broader bundle remains understudied in urban Ghana, risking implementation failure. Objective: This study evaluated the prevalence and socio-political determinants of public support for a comprehensive suite of food environment policies among adults in the Cape Coast Metropolis, Ghana, and explored underlying motivations. Methods: Convergent mixed-methods design. Cross-sectional survey of 450 adults (18-69 years) using multi-stage cluster sampling. Support measured via validated 5-point Likert scales. Twenty-four in-depth interviews provided qualitative depth. Results: Support was highest for front-of-pack warning labeling (81.4%), followed by marketing restrictions (76.8%), the sugar-sweetened beverage tax (71.2%), and public procurement (65.6%). Perceived policy effectiveness (adjusted odds ratio = 3.45) and trust in the Ghana Health Service (adjusted odds ratio = 1.92) were the strongest predictors. Qualitative findings revealed that support for the tax increases significantly if revenues are ring-fenced for the National Health Insurance Scheme. Conclusion: Policymakers should immediately prioritize front-of-pack warning labeling and marketing restrictions as highly acceptable "empowerment" policies, while simultaneously legislating transparent earmarking of sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues for non-communicable disease treatment and prevention. Future research should test these policies post-implementation using longitudinal designs.

Indexed as

food marketing restrictionsfront-of-pack warning labelingGhananon-communicable diseasespublic supportsugar-sweetened beverage taxTheory of Planned Behavior

Identifiers

PMID42712393
PMCPMC13549870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.