ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Toward dynamic tongue diagnosis: a conceptual framework for temporal phenotyping.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital tongue diagnosis has advanced considerably through image-based feature extraction and machine learning, yet its dominant analytical paradigm remains anchored in static, single-frame examination-an approach that inherently discards temporal information generated during the examination process, including stabilization dynamics, fluctuation patterns, and short-term physiological responsiveness. In this Perspective, we argue for a reorientation from static feature categorization towards temporal phenotyping. We propose a four-component analytical framework comprising: (i) standardized video acquisition with minimum technical specifications for clinical feasibility; (ii) temporal event alignment anchored to physiologically defined reference points such as protrusion onset and maximal extension; (iii) steady-state window identification using CIELAB ΔE-based criteria to isolate analytically meaningful intervals; and (iv) dynamic feature representation that distinguishes quantitative temporal metrics from clinically interpretable phenotypes. We further delineate the evidentiary requirements-biological plausibility, measurement reproducibility, analytical validity, and clinical utility-necessary to substantiate this paradigm shift, and outline a staged validation pathway from controlled laboratory studies to prospective clinical evaluation. Potential applications include longitudinal health monitoring, individualised assessment, and telemedicine integration. Despite substantial translational barriers, we contend that a temporally informed framework offers a more comprehensive and clinically meaningful foundation for next-generation digital tongue diagnosis systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.