Observational studyFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Comparative effectiveness of dienogest versus ethinyl estradiol/levonorgestrel combined oral contraceptive therapy in women with endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain.
Observational study in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the clinical effectiveness of combined oral contraceptive pills (levonorgestrel-containing COC) and dienogest in the management of endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain and related symptoms. Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at GSVM Medical College, Kanpur, India, between 2023 and 2024. A total of 140 women with clinically and ultrasonographically diagnosed endometriosis-associated pelvic pain completed the study and were included in the final analysis. Participants received either dienogest (2 mg once daily) or a continuous combined oral contraceptive containing ethinyl estradiol 0.03 mg and levonorgestrel 0.15 mg for 3 months. Pain severity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and during monthly follow-up visits. Longitudinal changes in pain scores and associated symptoms were compared between the treatment groups. Results: Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. The mean age of participants in the OCP and dienogest groups was 31.47 ± 8.90 and 31.08 ± 8.78 years, respectively (p=0.794). Baseline mean VAS scores were 8.55 ± 0.98 and 7.77 ± 0.90 in the OCP and dienogest groups, respectively. A significant reduction in VAS scores was observed in both groups throughout the follow-up period (p<0.001). At 3 months, the mean VAS score decreased to 4.28 ± 1.15 and 5.22 ± 1.66 in the OCP and dienogest groups, respectively (p<0.001). Significant improvement in dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, menstrual irregularities, and chronic pelvic pain was also observed in both groups during follow-up. Conclusion: Both treatments were associated with significant improvement in endometriosis-associated pain, and the OCP group showed greater short-term pain reduction in this cohort, suggesting that the evaluated levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol regimen may represent a conservative treatment option, particularly in resource-limited healthcare settings. Larger multicenter longitudinal studies are warranted to further validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.