ArticleBMJ digital health & AI2025
Patterns of online consultation use in Great Britain, 2019-2023: an observational analysis.
Article in BMJ digital health & AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Digital Health Literacy in the United Kingdom: Cross-Sectional Online Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Why coding the modality of primary care consultations matters.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To examine online consultation (OC) uptake and usage patterns over time in Great Britain by patient characteristics, practice location and condition/symptom-specific OC template type, for a major provider of OC services (eConsult). Methods and analysis: An observational study was conducted using records of OCs completed between January 2019 and December 2023. Main outcome measures were OC volume and rates by country, region, deprivation level, template type and user demographics (age group and sex). Results: Over 43 million OCs were submitted on the eConsult platform within the time frame. The number of OCs per month greatly increased in early 2020 after the introduction of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions on in-person contacts. Sign-ups to the platform were highest between February and May of 2020. At their respective peaks, 43.7% of English practices, 11.6% of Scottish practices and 50.5% of Welsh practices were active in eConsult. Rates of OCs declined throughout 2022 and most of 2023 and were highest in more affluent areas. For England, Scotland and Wales, respectively, OC rates peaked in October 2021 at 17.6, 10.5 and 20.4 OCs per 1000 general practitioner-registered patients. Nearly two-thirds (64.4%) of OCs were completed by female patients. The proportion of OCs for children aged ≤10 has risen over time. 89% of OCs were submitted to the patient's practice, whereas 7.7% were redirected out towards urgent or emergency care services. Over time, there have been decreases in the number of OCs submitted at the weekend and in usage of generic 'general advice' templates. Conclusions: These findings reveal the substantial and evolving utilisation of eConsult over time across Great Britain. These findings may reflect evolving product functionality and engagement with OC services by patients and clinical staff, or local differences in service coordination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.