Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42712327›Full record

ArticleBMJ digital health & AI2026

Machine learning-based prediction of bacterial infection foci: model development, calibration and uncertainty quantification using conformal prediction methods.

Jacob Bahnsen Schmidt, Karen Leth Nielsen, Dmytro Strunin, Nikolai S Kirkby, Jesper Q Thomassen, Steen C Rasmussen, Ruth Frikke-Schmidt, Frederik Boetius Hertz, Allan Peter Engsig-Karup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ digital health & AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jacob Bahnsen SchmidtDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0009-0004-7822-8037
Karen Leth NielsenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-1985
Dmytro StruninDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nikolai S KirkbyDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper Q ThomassenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steen C RasmussenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ruth Frikke-SchmidtDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Frederik Boetius HertzDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0888-4616
Allan Peter Engsig-KarupDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-8626-1575

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To develop and evaluate machine learning (ML) models capable of reliably predicting the focus of bacterial infections in hospitalised patients, addressing limitations of conventional microbiological diagnostics. Methods and analysis: We conducted a retrospective study using data from 10 153 patients admitted to Rigshospitalet, Denmark, between 1 November 2019 and 3 June 2023. The dataset included microbiological findings, biochemical measurements and vital parameters. ML models were trained and evaluated, with outputs calibrated using Venn-ABERS calibration. Model uncertainty was quantified through conformal risk control to provide statistically robust uncertainty estimates. Results: This study shows that the XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance, achieving a log loss of 0.209±0.006 (mean±SD) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.93±0.007. Incorporating conformal prediction techniques enhanced predictive reliability by combining high accuracy with calibrated probabilistic predictions and uncertainty estimates. Conclusion: We find that ML models, particularly XGBoost combined with conformal prediction frameworks, can accurately predict the focus of bacterial infections while providing robust uncertainty quantification. This approach offers a promising addition to conventional diagnostic methods, potentially improving clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceElectronic Health RecordsInfectious Disease MedicineMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID42712327
PMCPMC13528319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.