Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42712321›Full record

ArticleBMJ digital health & AI2026

Use of artificial intelligence in the out-of-hospital care settings: a scoping review.

Jamie Miles, Mike Brady, Leanne Smith, Charlotte Cotterill, Charlotte Levey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ digital health & AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jamie MilesThe University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Mike BradyWelsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, Cwmbran, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6675-9149
Leanne SmithWelsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, Cwmbran, Wales, UK.
Charlotte CotterillThe University of Sheffield Faculty of Medicine Dentistry and Health, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK.
Charlotte LeveyWelsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust, Cwmbran, Wales, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Out-of-hospital services face significant challenges, including growing patient demand, workforce limitations and evolving care pathways. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies offer potential solutions, but their application in out-of-hospital settings remains inconsistently implemented and poorly understood. Objective: To identify the types of AI technologies being applied in out-of-hospital settings, explore their purposes and implementation contexts and examine associated outcomes. Methods: Six electronic databases were searched for English-language studies published between 2013 and 2024. Eligible studies involved AI technologies in the out-of-hospital emergency services setting. Data were synthesised according to six implementation domains: system level, dispatch zone, response zone, on-scene zone, onward prognosis and inferential (insights). Results: From 236 publications, we identified diverse AI applications across the care pathway. System-level implementations (46 studies) featured AI for demand forecasting, optimal resource allocation and strategic facility location, with demonstrated improvements in coverage efficiency of 10-20%. In the dispatch zone (32 studies), AI-enhanced emergency call triage and ambulance allocation reduced response times by up to 10-20%. Response-level applications (43 studies) included intelligent traffic management and real-time route optimisation, reducing travel times by 15-30%. On-scene zone implementations (75 studies) supported clinical decision-making with cardiac arrest rhythm detection, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.90 and acute coronary syndrome prediction sensitivities of 85-90%. Onward prognosis models (19 studies) predicted patient outcomes with some AUC values of 0.80-0.90 for survival forecasting, enabling better resource allocation and early intervention. Further inferential analysis applications (21 studies) were also identified that provide higher-level insights through secondary analyses of out-of-hospital data. Conclusions: AI demonstrates significant potential across the care pathway, from operational optimisation to clinical decision support. Future development should focus on real-time adaptive systems, ethical implementation, improved data integration across the care continuum and rigorous evaluation of real-time patient outcomes. Cross-disciplinary collaboration and standardised reporting of AI implementations will be essential to realise the full potential of these technologies in improving out-of-hospital care delivery.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceEmergency Service, HospitalHospitals

Identifiers

PMID42712321
PMCPMC13492550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.