ArticleBMJ digital health & AI2026
Detecting sleep stages after stroke using wearable sensors: machine learning design and challenges.
Article in BMJ digital health & AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Individuals with stroke often experience poor sleep, which negatively impacts health and quality of life. Assessing time spent in different sleep stages (such as deep or rapid eye movement sleep) is critical because these stages play distinct roles in brain health. Frequent, high-resolution sleep assessments could improve early diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders during recovery. However, polysomnography (PSG), the gold standard, is difficult to implement in inpatient settings due to cost, complexity and patient burden. Wearable sensors paired with machine learning models offer a scalable alternative, but stroke-related physiological changes reduce model accuracy, and post-stroke PSG data are scarce. To address these gaps, we explored sleep-stage classifier models trained using different data combinations from inpatient, chronic and non-stroke populations. Methods and analysis: 14 sleep-stage classifiers were developed from three datasets: 8 inpatients undergoing stroke rehabilitation, 131 individuals with chronic stroke and 145 non-stroke controls. Ordinal logistic regression models classified sleep into two, three or four stages using heart rate and R-R interval features from ECG or blood oxygen saturation (SpO Results: Leave-one-subject-out models trained on control and/or chronic stroke ECG improved detection of inpatient sleep stages over inpatient-trained models alone (Cohen's kappa=0.31, 0.24, 0.17 for 2-, 3-, 4-stage classifiers, respectively). Adding SpO Conclusion: Mixed-population training data enhance post-stroke sleep stage classification. Findings support scalable, wearables-based sleep monitoring to inform personalised interventions during stroke recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.