Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42712291›Full record

ArticleBMJ digital health & AI2025

INSIGHTFUL: insight generation through clinical annotation, analysis and modelling of suicide-related factors towards understanding and lifesaving.

Zehan Li, Rodrigo M Vieira, Sunyang Fu, Yan Hu, Wanjing Wang, Andrew Wen, Scott D Lane, Salih Selek, Lokesh R Shahani, Hua Xu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ digital health & AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Suicide Phenotyping from Clinical Notes in Safety-Net Psychiatric Hospital Using Multi-Label Classification with Pre-Trained Language Models.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zehan LiBiomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4996-8480
Rodrigo M VieiraDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Sunyang FuBiomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Yan HuBiomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Wanjing WangBiomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Andrew WenBiomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Scott D LaneDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Salih SelekDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lokesh R ShahaniDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hua XuBiomedical Informatics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Jair C SoaresDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
Hongfang LiuBiomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Ming HuangBiomedical Informatics, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Funding

Semi-structured Information Retrieval in Clinical Text for Cohort IdentificationR01LM011934 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI HERSH, WILLIAM R, LIU, HONGFANG · 2014 to 2025
$5.1M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011934
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Suicide and self-injury identification remain a medical and public health priority, particularly among underserved populations receiving care in safety-net psychiatric hospitals. However, clinical data are not readily available to support the rapid advancement of research leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) methods for insights generation. To further our understanding of suicidal events and related factors documented in clinical notes within the context of psychiatric safety-net hospitals, we aim to develop a gold-standard corpus of suicidality, perform a manual content analysis and deploy natural language processing algorithms for automating text classification. Methods and analysis: A multidisciplinary panel developed an annotation guideline to capture four key suicide-related factors: suicidal ideation (SI), suicide attempt (SA), exposure to suicide and non-suicidal self-injury. We created an annotated corpus of 500 notes through a clinically validated annotation process and performed cohort analysis to characterise demographic and suicidal distributions. A pretrained language model was deployed for automatic classification. Results: The annotated corpus was created with a Cohen's kappa of 0.95 and further de-identified for data sharing. Most notes (79.4%) contained one (34.4%) or more (45%) suicide-related labels, with SI and SA co-occurrence as the most frequent combination (35.6%), which demonstrates significant overlap. The cohort was characterised by a mean age of 33.4, 51.7% male and 75.8% singles. Prevalent stressors included unemployment (24.2%), homelessness (12.0%), limited healthcare access (5.4%) and legal challenges (5.0%). We identified four key insights to improve documenting suicidality, including implicitness, confliction, ambiguity and definition coverage incompleteness. The baseline model achieved a micro-averaged F1 score of 0.70, demonstrating satisfying performance in multi-label classification. Conclusion: The near-perfect inter-annotator agreement underscores the proposed annotation process and data quality. Cohort analysis highlights the distribution and documentation insights of suicidality. Data modelling demonstrates the potential of insight generation via AI-powered methods for mining large-scale clinical notes.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBMJ Health InformaticsInformation ScienceMachine LearningMedical Informatics

Identifiers

PMID42712291
PMCPMC13528329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.