ArticleBMJ digital health & AI2025
INSIGHTFUL: insight generation through clinical annotation, analysis and modelling of suicide-related factors towards understanding and lifesaving.
Article in BMJ digital health & AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multi-site benchmarking framework for scalable extraction of geriatric care constructs from electronic health records.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Suicide Phenotyping from Clinical Notes in Safety-Net Psychiatric Hospital Using Multi-Label Classification with Pre-Trained Language Models.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025Article
- Explainable Suicide Phenotyping from Initial Psychiatric Evaluation Notes Using Reasoning Large Language Models.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Suicide and self-injury identification remain a medical and public health priority, particularly among underserved populations receiving care in safety-net psychiatric hospitals. However, clinical data are not readily available to support the rapid advancement of research leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) methods for insights generation. To further our understanding of suicidal events and related factors documented in clinical notes within the context of psychiatric safety-net hospitals, we aim to develop a gold-standard corpus of suicidality, perform a manual content analysis and deploy natural language processing algorithms for automating text classification. Methods and analysis: A multidisciplinary panel developed an annotation guideline to capture four key suicide-related factors: suicidal ideation (SI), suicide attempt (SA), exposure to suicide and non-suicidal self-injury. We created an annotated corpus of 500 notes through a clinically validated annotation process and performed cohort analysis to characterise demographic and suicidal distributions. A pretrained language model was deployed for automatic classification. Results: The annotated corpus was created with a Cohen's kappa of 0.95 and further de-identified for data sharing. Most notes (79.4%) contained one (34.4%) or more (45%) suicide-related labels, with SI and SA co-occurrence as the most frequent combination (35.6%), which demonstrates significant overlap. The cohort was characterised by a mean age of 33.4, 51.7% male and 75.8% singles. Prevalent stressors included unemployment (24.2%), homelessness (12.0%), limited healthcare access (5.4%) and legal challenges (5.0%). We identified four key insights to improve documenting suicidality, including implicitness, confliction, ambiguity and definition coverage incompleteness. The baseline model achieved a micro-averaged F1 score of 0.70, demonstrating satisfying performance in multi-label classification. Conclusion: The near-perfect inter-annotator agreement underscores the proposed annotation process and data quality. Cohort analysis highlights the distribution and documentation insights of suicidality. Data modelling demonstrates the potential of insight generation via AI-powered methods for mining large-scale clinical notes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.