ArticleBMJ digital health & AI2025
High-accuracy ECG image interpretation using parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning with multimodal LLaMA V.3.2.
Article in BMJ digital health & AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance of Vision-Enabled Large Language Models in Image-Based Electrocardiogram Interpretation: Exploratory Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop and evaluate a high-accuracy ECG image interpretation model using parameter-efficient Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) fine-tuning with the multimodal LLaMA V.3.2 model. Methods and analysis: We fine-tuned the multimodal LLaMA V.3.2 model (ECG-LLaMA) using parameter-efficient LoRA with a rank of 64 on the ECGInstruct dataset, which contains 1 million samples of ECG images paired with expert annotations. The model was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC), Macro F1 score, Hamming loss and a report generation quality score evaluated by GPT-4O using criteria of medical accuracy, completeness and clinical utility. Ablation studies were conducted to assess the impact of LoRA rank and compare parameter-efficient tuning with partial parameter tuning. Results: The fine-tuned model achieved significant improvements over the baseline LLaMA V.3.2 model across all metrics, with an AUC of 0.98 (vs 0.51), Macro F1 of 0.74 (vs 0.33), Hamming loss of 0.11 (vs 0.49) and report generation quality score of 85.4 (vs 47.8). Parameter-efficient LoRA outperformed partial parameter tuning, with optimal performance at a LoRA rank of 64. Error analysis revealed higher accuracy for common arrhythmias (>90%) with more challenges in detecting subtle abnormalities. Conclusion: Parameter-efficient LoRA fine-tuning of the multimodal LLaMA V.3.2 model significantly improves ECG image interpretation accuracy, offering a promising approach for developing artificial intelligence systems that can assist in clinical ECG interpretation, particularly in settings where expert cardiologists may not be readily available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.