ArticleClinical psychology & psychotherapy
A Response to Dimaggio et al.'s Commentary on Mohajerin et al. (2026).
Article in Clinical psychology & psychotherapy. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our randomized controlled trial comparing Unified Protocol (UP) and Schema-Focused Therapy (SFT) for grandiose and vulnerable presentations of narcissism has recently been critiqued in a commentary by Dimaggio et al. (2026). These authors raised concerns regarding the study's recruitment and subgroup classification, gender distribution, treatment response patterns, absence of dropouts, randomization, screening and recruitment procedures, trial registration, outcome assessment, supervision and treatment fidelity, treatment dose and duration, and disclosure of the NPD diagnosis. In this response, we clarify these methodological and procedural issues and provide additional information that was not fully described in the original article. We maintain that while both treatments were effective in ameliorating symptoms of narcissism, SFT was more effective in treating grandiose features, while UP was more effective in treating vulnerable features. Trial Registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials identifier: IRCT20231106059970N3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.