ReviewEuropean journal of neurology2026
Harmonized Acquisition of Connectome MRI and Clinical Data for Stroke, Parkinson's Disease and Glioma: Delphi-Derived Protocol Recommendations by the European Academy of Neurology.
Review in European journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND
aimsThe European Academy of Neurology (EAN) joined the Horizon Europe EBRAINS 2.0 research consortium to co-develop recommendations for prospective acquisition and integration of clinical and research core multi-scale human datasets for connectome analysis in stroke, Parkinson's disease (PD), and glioma (GBM).
methodsUsing an online Delphi survey method, expert consensus was sought on 28 statements for each of the following protocols in stroke, PD and GBM: clinical core/research brain MRI, minimum/extended clinical outcomes, minimum/extended cognition assessments, case report forms (CRF). The level of agreement for each statement was predefined as ≥ 80%. 536 experts from four EAN Scientific Panels (SP) (SP Neuro-oncology [n = 70], SP Movement Disorders [n = 206], SP Neuroimaging [n = 112], SP Stroke [n = 148]) were invited to participate in this Delphi process.
resultsTwo Delphi voting rounds were conducted to reach the predefined level of agreement (≥ 80%; range: 80.49%-100%) for all items to establish consensus on protocol recommendations for stroke, PD and GBM. Cumulative response rate from SP experts was 25% (n = 135 from 30 European countries) for the first, and 32% (n = 173 from 35 European countries) for the second Delphi voting round. DISCUSSION: These consented protocols provide a pragmatic framework for harmonizing multi-scale data acquisition for connectome analyses in stroke, PD, and GBM. Further, these protocols allow future modular extensions for other datasets, e.g., neurophysiological data or non-imaging biomarkers, and serve as a role model for brain network analyses in other neurological disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.