ArticleGlobal spine journal2026
Fusion Assessment, Reoperation Rates, and Imaging Modality Agreement after Four-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Single-Center Study.
Article in Global spine journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study DesignRetrospective single-center cohort study.ObjectiveTo evaluate fusion and reoperation rates after four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using a hierarchical imaging strategy, and to assess agreement between imaging modalities.MethodsPatients undergoing primary four-level ACDF with postoperative imaging for fusion assessment and ≥2-year follow-up were included. Fusion status by ≥12 months was determined using a hierarchical imaging strategy, with computed tomography (CT) prioritized, followed by dynamic flexion-extension (F-E) radiographs and plain radiographs. Early fusion (6-12 months) was analyzed separately. Reoperation within 24 months was recorded. Agreement between imaging modalities was assessed using Fleiss' kappa for tri-modality comparison and Cohen's kappa for pairwise analyses.ResultA total of 152 patients had imaging available for fusion assessment; 140 had ≥12-month follow-up. Fusion by 12 months was observed in 81.4% (114/140). Early fusion occurred in 70.1% (101/144). Nonunion most commonly involved a single level, predominantly at C6-7. Within 24 months, reoperation occurred in 7.7% of patients with nonunion and 2.6% of fused patients. In a tri-modality subset, overall agreement was high (κ=0.823), with near-perfect agreement between CT and F-E radiographs (κ=0.938).ConclusionFour-level ACDF demonstrated high fusion rates and low reoperation rates in one of the largest single-center cohorts reported to date. CT and F-E radiographs showed strong agreement, while plain radiographs tended to overestimate fusion. These findings suggest that acceptable outcomes may be achieved in appropriately selected patients and that construct length alone should not preclude consideration of an anterior-only approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.