ArticleAmerican journal of botany2026
Cellular basis for blade splitting in bull kelp, Nereocystis luetkeana.
Article in American journal of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
premiseBlade splitting in bull kelp, Nereocystis luetkeana is central to thallus development and function, yet the cellular basis of this process remains poorly understood. Two historical models proposed contrasting mechanisms: One attributes blade separation primarily to programmed cell death, whereas the other suggests mechanical tearing followed by tissue regeneration. Resolving the mechanism underlying blade splitting is important for understanding kelp morphogenesis and functional morphology in high-flow environments.
methodsWe used bright-field light microscopy to examine histological sections of developing blades undergoing separation and compared their tissue structure with predictions from the two historical models. Cellular organization, tissue thickness, and evidence of cell death and recovery were assessed during successive stages of blade separation.
resultsWe found no evidence of programmed cell death associated with blade division. Instead, blade splitting proceeds through a developmental sequence involving localized tissue thinning, mechanical tearing, and rapid healing. Thinning occurs without a loss of cells, indicating reduced extracellular matrix rather than cell death. Following mechanical tearing of the blade tissue, newly exposed blade margins rapidly undergo cell proliferation to regenerate new blade surfaces. Comparisons of this process to sorus detachment in this species, which involves programmed cell death, further demonstrate that blade splitting operates through a distinct physiological pathway.
conclusionsBlade splitting in Nereocystis is driven by mechanical tearing facilitated by localized reductions in blade thickness rather than programmed cell death. By subtly modifying tissue geometry, developing blades harness hydrodynamic forces to direct tearing and thereby produce streamlined morphologies and extensive habitat in hydrodynamically stressful environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.