ArticleRadiology and oncology2026
Electrochemotherapy for cutaneous tumors combined with tumor irradiation before or after treatment: feasibility, safety, and effectiveness.
Article in Radiology and oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectrochemotherapy (ECT) can be performed on tumors in patients that precedes tumor irradiation or on recurrent tumors after tumor irradiation. In this study we evaluated the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of the combined ECT and tumor irradiation (radiotherapy, RT) on different tumors in the head and neck region. PATIENTS AND
methodsFor the present cohort analysis, patients were selected from the Insp-ECT database, based on the following criteria: presence of head and neck lesions of any histological origin, treatment with both ECT and RT in any sequence, and a maximum interval of 12 months between the two treatments. The patients were treated with ECT followed by RT (ECT → RT) or RT followed by ECT (RT → ECT), in both cases because the first treatment resulted in incomplete response or subsequent relapse. In the case of ECT → RT the meantime interval was 5.7 months and in the case of RT → ECT 7.6 months. The minimal time interval between the treatments was 1 month.
resultsTreatment with ECT with bleomycin was feasible in all patients, treated either before or after RT. Included were 37 patients with the head and neck lesions. The combined treatment was performed predominantly on older population of patients with the age range from 50 to 96 years, median over 80 years. Importantly, in the group ECT → RT the major reason for RT was partial response (67%) after ECT. While, in the RT → ECT group the major reason for subsequent ECT was 58% of stable or progressive disease (failure to treatment). In both groups local symptoms decreased, like ulceration, odour and suppuration of tumors. In the ECT → RT group, the short-term response after 2 months was high, with 89% objective responses. In contrast, the RT → ECT group had a significantly lower rate, with 58% objective responses. At 24-month progression free survival (PFS) was 68% in the ECT → RT group and 20% in the RT → ECT group (p = 0.0101). The overall progression free survival Kaplan-Meier curves also differed significantly (log-rank p = 0.0232).
conclusionsThe combined treatment of ECT and RT is feasible, safe, and effective in elderly patients. The findings suggest that ECT may have particular value as a neoadjuvant treatment before RT, especially for bulky, ulcerated, or symptomatic lesions in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.