Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711859›Full record

ReviewFEBS letters2026

'Guide and Prejudice'- How Argonautes recognize targets across domains of life.

Jack P K Bravo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in FEBS letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jack P K BravoInstitute of Science and Technology, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0456-0753

Funding

Austrian Science Fund 10.55776/PAT1617625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Argonaute proteins mediate RNA interference in eukaryotes and nucleic-acid defence in prokaryotes. Although these systems operate in distinct biological contexts and produce diverse downstream outcomes, they share a conserved structural architecture and mechanism of guide-dependent target recognition. Here, we argue that Argonautes function as programmable surveillance platforms that kinetically sample nucleic acids, engage targets through sequential pairing and conformational checkpoints, and couple recognition to functional outputs through regulated structural transitions. Rather than representing distinct recognition mechanisms, the diverse targeting behaviours observed across Argonaute families reflect different implementations of this shared framework, in which guide biogenesis, target accessibility, pairing requirements and effector coupling are weighted differently according to biological context. Viewing Argonautes through this common operational logic reconciles apparent differences in specificity, mismatch tolerance and target selection across systems, while providing a unified conceptual framework for understanding their evolution and guiding the engineering of programmable nucleic-acid recognition technologies.

Indexed as

Argonaute ProteinsAnimalsHumansNucleic AcidsRNA InterferenceArgonaute ProteinsNucleic AcidsallosteryArgonauteguide RNAguide–target pairingnucleic‐acid defencenucleic‐acid surveillanceprokaryotic ArgonauteRNA interferencetarget recognitiontarget search

Identifiers

PMID42711859
PMCPMC13618286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.