ArticleJournal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition2026
Exploratory case comparison of gut microbiome functional potential in ultramarathoners differing in adiposity and finish time.
Article in Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding variations in gut microbial functional potential among endurance athletes may inform future personalized nutritional strategies. This exploratory case-comparison study aimed to investigate predicted microbial functional potential using shotgun metagenomic sequencing and fecal metabolites, in two post hoc-selected runners who represented extreme and contrasting outcomes from the same single-stage 217 km mountain ultramarathon: a normal-BMI fast-finisher and an obese slow-finisher. The main descriptive findings suggest that the normal-BMI fast finisher exhibited smaller observed differences among the analyzed enzyme-coding functions and pathways in the sample collected after race completion, with a predominance of enzyme-coding functions associated with nucleic acid-related processes and protein biosynthesis. In contrast, the obese slow-finisher showed larger observed differences in predicted functional potential between the pre- and post-race samples. Distinct fecal metabolite patterns were also observed, with selective short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) changes in the normal-BMI fast-finisher and reductions across all analyzed SCFAs in the obese slow finisher. Given the limitations of this study, including the confounding effects of adiposity, unmeasured dietary intake, and post hoc selection bias, these descriptive observations provide hypothesis-generating data rather than establishing causal relationships with performance. Taken together, these findings encourage further investigation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.