Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711757›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Prediction of the clinical outcomes of imipenem and meropenem in patients with treatment-associated AKI and death via machine learning models combined with pharmacokinetic parameters: A retrospective cohort study.

Yun Chen, Danling Zheng, Chengkuan Zhao, Shiying Li, Chengcheng Xu, Zuojun Huang, Lingyu Zhang, Xiaolong Wu, Shuyao Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yun ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2716-6951
Danling ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chengkuan ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shiying LiDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Chengcheng XuDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Zuojun HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lingyu ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaolong WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Shuyao ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital (Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital of Jinan University), Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ObjectiveThe present study aimed to develop and evaluate machine learning-based predictive models for acute kidney injury (AKI) and all-cause mortality in patients treated with imipenem or meropenem, integrating pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters with routine clinical features.MethodsA total of 235 patients who received imipenem (n = 121) or meropenem (n = 114) between May 2021 and November 2023 were included. Elimination phase and trough concentrations were quantified by UPLC-MS/MS, and a nonlinear mixed-effects model was applied to derive PK/PD parameters. Linear regression was performed to examine associations between baseline characteristics and trough concentrations. Logistic regression was used for initial feature screening, after which 13 machine learning classifiers were developed to predict AKI and mortality. Model discrimination was evaluated using bootstrap internal validation, calibration was assessed via calibration curves, feature importance was examined using SHAP values, and clinical utility was evaluated through decision curve analysis.ResultsThe incidence of AKI was 25.6% (31/121) in the imipenem group and 10.5% (12/114) in the meropenem group. For imipenem-related AKI, the Random Forest classifier yielded the highest discriminative performance (AUC: 0.996, 95% CI: 0.988-1.000); XGBoost performed optimally for meropenem-related AKI (AUC: 0.938, 95% CI: 0.876-1.000). For mortality prediction, Random Forest achieved the best performance for the imipenem group (AUC: 0.963, 95% CI: 0.923-1.000) and XGBoost for the meropenem group (AUC: 0.983, 95% CI: 0.957-1.000). SHAP analysis identified renal function indicators and PK parameters as the predominant contributors to model predictions. Decision curve analysis confirmed favorable net benefit across all optimal models.ConclusionsMachine learning models integrating PK parameters with clinical features demonstrated discriminative ability for predicting carbapenem-associated AKI and mortality. These findings support further investigation into the combination of therapeutic drug monitoring and machine learning analytics for risk stratification, though prospective external validation is required.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAnti-Bacterial AgentsImipenemMachine LearningMeropenemAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsImipenemMeropenemacute kidney injuryimipenemmachine learningmeropenemmortalitypharmacokinetic parameterstherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42711757
PMCPMC13554562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.