Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711714›Full record

ArticleLaboratory animal research2026

Reframing emergency preparedness from facility survival to laboratory animal welfare.

Seung Yeon Kim, Ji Min Lee, Seung Hyeok Seok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory animal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Seung Yeon Kim *Animal Research Facility, Science, Institutional Vaccine Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Min Lee *Institute of Environment and Safety, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hyeok SeokMacrophage Lab, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, and Institute of Endemic Disease, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. lamseok@snu.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-0688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNatural disasters, infrastructure failures, and infectious disease outbreaks can disrupt the operations of laboratory animal facilities and threaten both research continuity and animal welfare. Previous events, including Tropical Storm Allison and the Great East Japan Earthquake, demonstrated the vulnerability of laboratory animal populations during emergencies and highlighted the need to incorporate animal welfare considerations into emergency preparedness planning. The aim of this study was to identify key elements of emergency preparedness programs for laboratory animal facilities and to propose a framework to support the development of practical Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) in which animal welfare considerations are integrated into facility operations and decision-making processes during emergencies.

resultsRegulatory frameworks and guidance documents from the United States, Europe, Canada, and Korea were reviewed and compared to identify approaches applicable to laboratory animal facility management. The analysis included definitions of emergencies, core program components, veterinary oversight systems, and decision-making structures across these four regulatory contexts. Despite differences in regulatory approaches and institutional contexts, common elements were identified and organized into three functional domains: continuity of facility operations, protection of animal welfare, and institutional response capacity. Based on these findings, we propose an integrated emergency preparedness framework and a stepwise operational checklist intended to facilitate the integration of welfare priorities into emergency planning and response.

conclusionsEmergency preparedness should not be regarded solely as an operational requirement. In laboratory animal facilities, it should be understood as an extension of the animal welfare program that, while prioritizing personnel safety and institutional resilience, also seeks to minimize animal suffering and preserve the value of ongoing research when normal operating conditions cannot be maintained.

Indexed as

3RsAnimal welfareDisaster managementEmergency preparednessLaboratory animal facilities

Identifiers

PMID42711714
PMCPMC13551745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.