ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
A Multitask Deep Learning Pipeline for Classifying Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Hypertensive Heart Disease Based on Native T1 Mapping.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Differentiating hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) from hypertensive heart disease (HHD) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) native T1 mapping is clinically important, yet the two conditions overlap morphologically and global T1 values provide only moderate discrimination. We developed and rigorously evaluated a multitask deep learning pipeline for HCM/HHD classification. In this retrospective single-center study, 174 patients (121 HCM, 53 HHD) with 3.0-T modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) native T1 maps were analyzed under a two-stage protocol that strictly separated model selection from patient-level stratified fivefold cross-validation. The multitask model, comprising a shared ImageNet-pretrained ConvNeXt-base encoder, a lightweight feature pyramid segmentation head, and myocardium probability-weighted attention pooling, was compared with single-task models, a multivariable clinical logistic regression baseline, and state space (Mamba) architectures. The final model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.941 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.903-0.979), numerically higher than the best single-task model (0.902, ΔAUC + 0.039, bootstrap CI + 0.007 to + 0.074) and the clinical baseline (0.757, p < 0.0001), with consistent gains across four cross-validation seeds (mean 0.929). Its segmentation branch reached a Dice coefficient of 0.823, and all Mamba baselines were inferior (AUC 0.633-0.719). On an independent external test set of 20 patients, the model achieved AUC 0.885 (sensitivity 0.917, specificity 0.625). A multitask deep learning pipeline with segmentation-derived spatial regularization provides accurate HCM/HHD classification from native T1 maps, exceeding single-task and clinical baselines; larger multicenter validation is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42711647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.