ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
ParasiteNet: Deep Learning-Based Identification of Parasitic Helminth Eggs in Microscopic Images.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parasitic helminth infections remain a major public health concern, particularly in low-resource settings where microscopic diagnosis requires significant time and expertise. This study presents ParasiteNet, a deep learning-based framework for automated classification of 12 helminth egg categories from microscopic images. A dataset of 12,000 annotated images was used to train and evaluate two architectures: CNN+ResNet50 hybrid model and EfficientNetV2B0. Image preprocessing and augmentation techniques were applied to improve model robustness, and performance was evaluated using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and loss metrics. Experimental results showed that EfficientNetV2B0 achieved 96.92% classification accuracy with a loss of 0.0067, outperforming the CNN+ResNet50 hybrid model, which achieved 95.25% accuracy with a loss of 0.1840. The proposed framework demonstrates promising performance for automated parasite egg classification under controlled experimental conditions. However, additional validation using independent external datasets, diverse microscopy settings, and prospective clinical studies is necessary to establish the robustness and generalizability of the approach before real-world deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42711646What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.