Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711608›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Are letter features weighted asymmetrically during the early moments of lexical access? Evidence from masked priming in Serbian Cyrillic.

Olga Solaja, Manuel Perea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olga SolajaERI-Lectura and Department of Methodology, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain. olga.solaja@uv.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1840-4567
Manuel PereaERI-Lectura and Department of Methodology, Universitat de València, Av. Blasco Ibáñez, 21, 46010, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Models of visual word recognition assume that abstract letter identities are encoded from visual features; but the principles governing this mapping remain underspecified. In Latin-script languages, masked primes that omit a diacritic facilitate recognition almost as much as identity primes (e.g., facil → FÁCIL [easy]), whereas primes that add a diacritic produce much weaker facilitation (e.g., féliz → FELIZ [happy]). This asymmetry has been explained by the perceptual salience of diacritics, or by assuming that feature presence carries more weight than feature absence. We tested these alternatives in Serbian Cyrillic, which contains letter pairs that differ by a single integrated letter feature (e.g., Л - Љ; H - Њ). We conducted a masked priming lexical decision experiment in which a target stimulus could be preceded by an identity prime, a visually similar prime created by feature omission or feature addition, or a visually dissimilar control prime. For targets containing complex letters (Љ/Њ), omission primes were as effective as identity primes (e.g., кoницa → КOЊИЦA). For targets containing simple letters (Л/H), addition primes produced a substantial cost relative to identity primes (e.g., кoњaц → КOHAЦ). Thus, the addition-omission asymmetry reported for diacritics generalizes to letters that differ by an integrated visual feature. These findings favor a general account in which the presence of a feature is weighted more heavily than its absence during the earliest stages of orthographic processing.

Indexed as

LanguagePattern Recognition, VisualPerceptual MaskingPsycholinguisticsReadingHumansLetter featuresOrthographic processingVisual similarityVisual word recognition

Identifiers

PMID42711608
PMCPMC13553598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.