Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711570›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2026

Macula-vitreous interface vitrectomy for pediatric epiretinal membrane: surgical principles, clinical outcomes and safety profile.

Miner Yuan, Yizhe Cheng, Limei Sun, Linyan Zhang, Yili Jin, Aohan Hou, Xinyu Liu, Xiaoyan Ding

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Miner Yuan *State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Yizhe Cheng *State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Limei SunState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Linyan ZhangState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Yili JinState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Aohan HouState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China.
Xinyu LiuState Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China. liuxy45@163.com.
Xiaoyan DingDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China. dingxiaoyan@gzzoc.com.

Funding

Research Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology 304020161
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposesTo describe the surgical technique of Macula-Vitreous Interface Vitrectomy (MVIV), and report its clinical outcomes in pediatric patients with non-inflammatory epiretinal membrane (ERM).

methodsThis single-center retrospective case series included 42 pediatric patients (3 to 14 years) with unilateral non-inflammatory ERM who underwent MVIV between 2018 and 2023. MVIV involved selective removal of vitreous adjacent to the vitreomacular interface, primarily around the optic disc and macula within the vascular arcades, while preserving the central and peripheral vitreous. Outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters [central foveal thickness (CFT) or lesion thickness (LT)], intraocular pressure (IOP), and postoperative complications.

resultsMean age at surgery was 7.63 ± 2.97 years, with mean follow-up of 22.96 ± 11.43 months. BCVA improved from a median of 0.82 (IQR, 0.70-1.30) to 0.70 (IQR, 0.49-0.85), at 12 months (Hodges-Lehmann estimate, -0.20 logMAR; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.10; P < .001).CFT/LT decreased significantly (both P < .001). ERM recurred in one eye (2.4%). No postoperative cataract, retinal detachment, proliferative vitreoretinopathy, or sustained IOP abnormalities were identified.

conclusionsMVIV was associated with favorable anatomical and visual outcomes and few short- and medium-term postoperative complications in this cohort. These findings support the feasibility of MVIV as a surgical option for selected pediatric patients with non-inflammatory ERM. Further comparative studies with longer follow-up are warranted to define its role relative to conventional vitrectomy techniques.

Indexed as

Clinical outcomesLimited vitrectomyPediatric epiretinal membranePediatric retinaSurgical technique

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.