Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711533›Full record

ArticleNature ecology & evolution2026

Flexible use of conserved motifs constrains genome access in cell type evolution.

Chew Chai, Jesse Gibson, Pengyang Li, Brennan D McDonald, Anusri Pampari, Aman Patel, Anshul Kundaje, Bo Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature ecology & evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chew Chai *Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jesse Gibson *Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Pengyang LiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Brennan D McDonaldDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2321-0149
Anusri PampariDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Aman PatelDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Anshul KundajeDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3084-2287
Bo WangDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. wangbo@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8880-1432

Funding

Comparative systems biology defines regulatory mechanisms in whole-body regenerationR35GM138061 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Bo Wang · 2020 to 2026
$2.5M
SU | Stanford Bio-X IIP R11-40U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) R35GM138061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell types can be organized into related families, but the regulatory mechanisms that define and maintain these families across deep evolutionary time remain unknown. Here, combining single-nucleus multi-omic sequencing with deep learning to analyse the accessible genomes of two groups of vastly divergent animals including flatworms and vertebrates, we find that hundreds of accessibility-dictating sequence motifs partition into distinct yet conserved sets, or 'vocabularies', each associated with a specific cell type family. However, combinatorial relationships among these motifs preferred by individual cell types are largely species specific. Deep-learning models trained on one species accurately predict family-level chromatin accessibility in distantly related species, albeit frequently rely on different motifs from shared vocabularies to reach convergent predictions. By contrast, models trained on individual cell types within a family lose cross-species predictive power, indicating that the regulatory syntax governing cell type-level identity evolves rapidly. We propose a 'collective maintenance' model in which motif vocabularies defining cell type families are evolutionarily stable, while recombination of these motifs generates cell type-specific regulatory programmes. This suggests that family identity is maintained collectively by large, conserved pools of regulatory factors, analogous to the logic of developmental homology, where character identity persists through network-level conservation despite extensive rewiring.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.