ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Selective retrieval boosts memory regardless of prior knowledge.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forgetting is a core dynamic of memory which follows a rapid loss that slows into gradual decline. Notably, recent evidence suggests that selective retrieval strengthens recalled items, benefits nonretrieved ones, and reinstates the forgetting curve. A central question is whether these retrieval benefits depend on prior knowledge or reflect a domain-general mechanism. We tested 216 participants who studied high-knowledge (common) or low-knowledge (rare) Chinese characters and were assessed either directly or after a selective retrieval phase. Across conditions, retrieval boosted recall for both retrieved and nonretrieved characters and restarted forgetting functions. High-knowledge characters were remembered more accurately overall, but forgetting rates and retrieval-induced gains were equivalent across knowledge levels. These findings suggest that retrieval benefits can emerge independent of semantic expertise. By bridging expertise and forgetting literatures, our study provides evidence that selective retrieval as a domain-general phenomenon for stabilizing memory over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42711521What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.