Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711521›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Selective retrieval boosts memory regardless of prior knowledge.

Zhehao Huang, Yang Cao, Jiali Li, Geoffrey F Woodman, Bao Zhang, Benchi Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhehao HuangInstitute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China.
Yang CaoInstitute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China. gnaycao.cy@gmail.com.
Jiali LiInstitute for Brain Research and Rehabilitation, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, 510631, China.
Geoffrey F WoodmanDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bao ZhangSchool of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou, 510006, China. zhangbao@gzhu.edu.cn.
Benchi WangKey Laboratory of Mental Health of the Ministry of Education, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Intelligence, Guangdong-Hong Kong Joint Laboratory for Psychiatric Disorders, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Psychiatric Disorders, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine for Qingzhi Diseases, Department of Neurobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China. wangbenchi.swift@gmail.com.

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong grant 2023A1515012789
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forgetting is a core dynamic of memory which follows a rapid loss that slows into gradual decline. Notably, recent evidence suggests that selective retrieval strengthens recalled items, benefits nonretrieved ones, and reinstates the forgetting curve. A central question is whether these retrieval benefits depend on prior knowledge or reflect a domain-general mechanism. We tested 216 participants who studied high-knowledge (common) or low-knowledge (rare) Chinese characters and were assessed either directly or after a selective retrieval phase. Across conditions, retrieval boosted recall for both retrieved and nonretrieved characters and restarted forgetting functions. High-knowledge characters were remembered more accurately overall, but forgetting rates and retrieval-induced gains were equivalent across knowledge levels. These findings suggest that retrieval benefits can emerge independent of semantic expertise. By bridging expertise and forgetting literatures, our study provides evidence that selective retrieval as a domain-general phenomenon for stabilizing memory over time.

Indexed as

Mental RecallPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultForgettingMemoryPrior knowledgeRetrieval

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.