ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Implementing Osteoporosis Screening in Hong Kong: A CFIR-Guided Qualitative Study of Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore perceptions of the potential implementation of osteoporosis screening among stakeholders, including service recipients, physicians, and policymakers, in Hong Kong.
methodsThis qualitative study involved one-on-one, in-depth interviews with key stakeholders relevant to osteoporosis screening in Hong Kong. Interviews explored perceptions of the feasibility and implementation of osteoporosis screening. The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was employed to guide the development of the interview guide and data analysis, focusing on five domains: Innovation, Outer Setting, Inner Setting, Individuals, and Implementation Process.
resultsA total of 35 participants were included, comprising 12 service recipients, 19 physicians, and 4 policymakers. Within the Innovation domain, the relative advantages of osteoporosis screening were widely recognized by service recipients and physicians, its evidence-based nature was emphasized by physicians. However, policymakers and some physicians raised concerns about the absence of local evidence. In the Outer Setting, financial concerns were consistently identified across stakeholder groups, whereas subsidies and affordable access were viewed as key facilitators of implementation. Within the Inner Setting, service recipients and policymakers reported insufficient dissemination of information, while physicians highlighted the primary barriers related to resource constraints within the clinical setting. At the Individual level, risk awareness and motivation for disease management facilitated participation among service recipients, while policymakers highlighted insufficient awareness about screening and the disease as a barrier. In the Implementation Process domain, service recipients emphasized community-based promotion, physicians highlighted the importance of multi-stakeholder collaboration and professional education, and policymakers identified limited coordination, unclear referral pathways, and difficulties in reaching vulnerable populations as barriers.
conclusionThis study identified perceived facilitators and barriers to implementing osteoporosis screening in Hong Kong, with the absence of local evidence, financial concerns, resource constraints, and low public awareness as major challenges despite recognized benefits. Overcoming these requires coordinated efforts across sectors, including policy support, public-private partnerships, and culturally tailored education to enhance access and participation. Future research should build on these findings to develop context-specific implementation strategies for osteoporosis screening in Hong Kong.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42711515What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.