ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Artificial intelligence -based modeling and comparative evaluation of craniofacial soft tissue and subcutaneous fat thickness using ct imaging for forensic identification in a northwestern indian population.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCraniofacial soft tissue thickness (CFSTT) is a critical parameter in forensic facial reconstruction, serving as a link between skeletal morphology and facial appearance. However, most existing studies rely on mean CFSTT values without considering the contribution of subcutaneous fat layer thickness, limiting the accuracy of reconstruction models.
objectiveThis study aims to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted, CT-based framework for the comparative evaluation of craniofacial soft tissue thickness and subcutaneous FLT in a Northwestern Indian population, with emphasis on sexual dimorphism, age-related variation, and bilateral symmetry. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted on CT scans of 1972 individuals aged 18-80 years. Measurements of CFSTT and FLT were obtained across 73 standardized craniofacial landmarks. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, independent t-tests, ANOVA, and Pearson correlation. AI-based predictive modeling was performed using regression and machine learning algorithms to evaluate relationships between variables and improve prediction accuracy.
resultsCFSTT values were consistently higher than FLT across all anatomical landmarks, indicating the contribution of both adipose and non-adipose components. A strong positive correlation between CFSTT and FLT was observed at the landmark level (R² ≈ 0.785), while a weaker association was noted at the age-group level (r ≈ 0.143). Significant sexual dimorphism was identified, with males exhibiting higher values than females, although effect sizes were small. Age-related analysis demonstrated an increase-peak-decline pattern, with maximum values observed in middle adulthood. Bilateral symmetry analysis revealed extremely high correlation between right and left sides (R² = 0.992). AI-assisted models demonstrated strong within-dataset performance, with R² values exceeding 0.90 for the best-performing models, and showed limited systematic bias.
conclusionThe integration of CFSTT and FLT provides a population-specific framework for characterizing craniofacial soft tissue architecture. AI-assisted models demonstrated strong within-dataset performance, particularly the Random Forest model; however, independent external validation is required to establish model generalizability. The resulting database provides reference data that may support future research in population-specific craniofacial modeling and forensic facial approximation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42711469What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.