Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711438›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Effects of graded dietary raw bee venom inclusion on growth, immunity, and disease resistance in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).

Rasha M Reda, Wafaa F A Ali, Doaa F El Moghazi, Gehan K Saleh, Mona E Elkenawy Mansour, Eman A Elalfy, Mohammed S Sobh, Fatma Mahsoub

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rasha M RedaDepartment of Aquatic Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, PO Box 44511, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt. rashareda55@yahoo.com.
Wafaa F A AliAnimal Health Research Institute (AHRI) (Mansoura Branch) Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Fish disease Department, P.O. Box 246, Dokki, Giza, 12618, Egypt.
Doaa F El MoghaziAnimal Health Research Institute (AHRI) (Mansoura Branch) Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Fish disease Department, P.O. Box 246, Dokki, Giza, 12618, Egypt.
Gehan K SalehAnimal Health Research Institute (AHRI) (Mansoura Branch) Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Biochemistry Department, P.O. Box 246, Dokki, Giza, 12618, Egypt.
Mona E Elkenawy MansourAnimal Health Research Institute (AHRI) (Mansoura Branch) Agriculture Research Center (ARC), Biochemistry Department, P.O. Box 246, Dokki, Giza, 12618, Egypt.
Eman A ElalfyResearcher of pharmacology, biochemistry department, Animal Health Research Institute (AHRI), Agricultural research center (ARC), Mansoura branch, P.O. Box 246, Dokki, Giza, 12618, Egypt.
Mohammed S SobhDepartment of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, PO Box 44511, Zagazig, Sharkia, Egypt.
Fatma MahsoubDepartment of Animal & Poultry Production, Faculty of Technology and Development, Zagazig University, PO Box 44511, Zagazig, Egypt. doctorrovan513@yahoo.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, studies on the application of bee venom (BV) in aquaculture have been growing due to its bioactive constituents. However, previous studies have focused on nano-formulated bee venom or parenteral administration routes on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). However, the effects of graded dietary supplementation of raw venom, especially at different inclusion levels, on Nile tilapia are still limited. Therefore, this study focused on investigating the effects of bee venom supplementation at different dosage levels on growth performance, hematological and biochemical parameters, antioxidant status, immune responses, immune-related gene expression, disease resistance against Aeromonas sobria, and economic efficiency. One hundred and eighty Nile tilapia were randomly assigned to 4 dietary groups (CONT, BV4, BV8, and BV12) with 3 replicates for each group. The CONT group received a basal diet. The BV4, BV8, and BV12 groups administered bee venom in their diet at 4, 8, and 12 mg/kg, respectively. The growth performance was significantly improved with increasing BV inclusion (P ≤ 0.005), with final body weight increasing from 49.16 g in CONT to 61.96 g in BV12, while FCR decreased from 1.75 to 1.43. Hematological parameters were improved in BV8 and BV12 groups, where hemoglobin concentration increased from 9.39 g/dl in CONT to 12.28 g/dl and white blood cell count increased from 6.08 × 10

Indexed as

Bee VenomsCichlidsDietary SupplementsDisease ResistanceFish DiseasesAeromonasAnimal FeedAnimalsAntioxidantsDietAntioxidantsBee VenomsAeromonas sobriaAntioxidant statusBee venomDose effectFunctional feed additivesGrowth performanceImmune responseNutraceutical

Identifiers

PMID42711438
PMCPMC13554140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.