Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711437›Full record

Trial reportInternational ophthalmology2026

The effect of compression dressing on postoperative outcomes after upper eyelid blepharoplasty: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded evaluation study.

Fatma Poslu Karademir, Selvihan Sağdıç Özçelik, Ayşe Çetin Efe, Mehmet Göksel Ulaş, İsmail Diri, Muhittin Taşkapılı

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07701265 (The Effect of Compression Dressing on Postoperative Outcomes After Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07701265 nacompletednot on this map

The Effect of Compression Dressing on Postoperative Outcomes After Upper Eyelid Blepharoplasty: A Randomized, Controlled, Observer-Blinded Evaluation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorFatma Poslu KarademirRan2025 to 2025Enrolled56ConditionsDermatochalasis of Upper EyelidArmsCompression Dressing (CD), No Dressing (Standard Postoperative Care)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fatma Poslu KarademirBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34421, Beyoğlu, Istanbul, Turkey. fatma.poslu@hotmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9460-2501
Selvihan Sağdıç ÖzçelikBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34421, Beyoğlu, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8620-5434
Ayşe Çetin EfeBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34421, Beyoğlu, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-0261
Mehmet Göksel UlaşBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34421, Beyoğlu, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7049-7065
İsmail DiriOphthalmology Clinic, Batigoz Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9299-7589
Muhittin TaşkapılıBeyoglu Eye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, 34421, Beyoğlu, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3089-7782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of a compression dressing on postoperative pain, ocular surface changes, edema, ecchymosis, and aesthetic outcomes following upper eyelid blepharoplasty.

methodsThis observer-blinded, randomized, controlled trial included 112 eyelids from 56 patients who underwent bilateral upper eyelid blepharoplasty between June and August 2025. After surgery, one eyelid received a compression dressing (CD), while the other eyelid received no dressing (ND). Edema and ecchymosis were graded by masked observers on postoperative days 1, 7, 30, and 90. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Score. Pain was evaluated using a visual analog scale, and patient comfort was assessed by side preference.

resultsOn postoperative day 1, ecchymosis scores were significantly lower in the CD group than in the ND group (unadjusted p = 0.002; Holm-adjusted p = 0.012). Edema scores were also lower on the CD side (unadjusted p = 0.012) and aesthetic scores were higher (unadjusted p = 0.046); however, neither difference remained statistically significant after Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (adjusted p = 0.060 and p = 0.138, respectively). No significant differences were observed in any parameter on postoperative days 7, 30, or 90 (all adjusted p > 0.05). Corneal staining scores were comparable between groups at all follow-ups, and no corneal erosions were observed. Pain scores on day 1 were similar (p = 0.977).

conclusionsCompression dressing after upper eyelid blepharoplasty was associated with a significant reduction in early postoperative ecchymosis, an effect that persisted after correction for multiple comparisons. Reductions in edema and improvements in aesthetic scores were observed on postoperative day 1 but did not remain statistically significant after adjustment. Overall, the benefits of compression dressing were limited in magnitude and transient, and routine use may not be necessary; its application should be individualized according to patient needs.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07701265 (retrospectively registered on July 8, 2026).

Indexed as

BlepharoplastyCompression BandagesEyelidsPostoperative ComplicationsAdultAgedEcchymosisEdemaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PainSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeCompression dressingEcchymosisEdemaPostoperative careUpper eyelid blepharoplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.