Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42711325›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Dissecting root-specific non-conventional effector-triggered immunity and its role in defense and shifting the microbiome.

Xianli Tang, Kaixiang Guan, Pengfei Meng, Tianyi Shao, Yong Zhang, Weilun Yin, Xinli Xia, Yi Song

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xianli TangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Kaixiang GuanShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Pengfei MengShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Tianyi ShaoShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China.
Yong ZhangCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Weilun YinState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6754-5772
Xinli XiaState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-3731-4970
Yi SongShenzhen Key Laboratory of Plant Genetic Engineering and Molecular Design, Institute of Plant and Food Science, Department of Biology, School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China. songy3@sustech.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-7129-7900

Funding

Guangdong Innovative and Entrepreneurial Research Team Program 2023ZT10Y013National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32270286Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission RCYX20231211090408015Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission ZDSYS20230626091659010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant roots are extremely heterogeneous and non-photosynthetic tissue that is drastically different from leaves. Pioneering studies have revealed the existence of pattern-triggered immune responses in roots; however, whether roots mount tissue-specific effector-triggered immunity (ETI) is a fundamental question in plant immunity. By utilizing inducible effector-expressing lines, we systematically characterize non-conventional physiological and molecular responses during ETI activation in roots. Root ETI seems to be weaker than leaf ETI, evidenced by restricted cell death in the transition zone and fewer number of differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Root ETI also shows much higher DEG overlap with Pep1-triggered immunity than with Flg22-triggered responses, which is the opposite trend in leaves. We find that both PEPR1/2 receptors and BIK1, WRKY42 are required for induced root ETI responses. By comparing root responses to wild type and the T3SS mutant of Ralstonia solanacearum in the Nd-1 ecotype, we confirm that natural root ETI responses show similarities to induced ETI. Our work reveals tissue-specific features of root ETI and provides new insights into engineering root disease resistance in agriculture.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisMicrobiotaPlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityPlant RootsArabidopsis ProteinsGene Expression Regulation, PlantInnate Immunity RecognitionPlant LeavesRalstonia solanacearumArabidopsis Proteins

Identifiers

PMID42711325
PMCPMC13554104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.