ReviewJournal of menopausal medicine2026
Expanding the Horizons of Menopausal Hormone Therapy: A Narrative Review of Progestogen-Only and Testosterone-Only Strategies for Tailored Management.
Review in Journal of menopausal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Estrogen-progestogen therapy remains the clinical gold standard for managing menopausal symptoms; however, the growing emphasis on precision medicine underscores the need for individualized strategies for females with specific contraindications or distinct clinical profiles. This narrative review examines the physiological mechanisms, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles of progestogen-only and testosterone-only therapies. Evidence suggests that progestogen-only therapy, particularly oral micronized progesterone (oP4), offers a robust alternative for alleviating vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbances through its action on GABAergic neurosteroid pathways. Notably, observational data from large cohort studies, including the Etude Epidémiologique auprès de femmes de la Mutuelle Générale de l'Education Nationale study, suggest that oP4 and dydrogesterone are associated with a more favorable risk profile for venous thromboembolism and breast cancer than synthetic progestins used in combined hormone therapy. Testosterone therapy is specifically indicated for hypoactive sexual desire disorder, with transdermal delivery preferred to bypass hepatic first-pass metabolism. In the absence of approved female-specific testosterone products in South Korea, cautious off-label dosing and rigorous monitoring remain essential. Overall, monotherapy with progestogens or testosterone constitutes a vital component of tailored menopause management, if clinicians adhere to evidence-based protocols and remain aware of the current limitations in long-term safety data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.