Observational studyBMJ open2026
Proficiency in lung ultrasound and perceived barriers to adoption among emergency physicians after a short pneumonia training programme: a multicentre observational study in Swiss emergency department.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05463406 (Procalcitonin and Lung Ultrasonography Based Antibiotherapy in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Swiss Emergency Departments), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Procalcitonin and Lung Ultrasonography Based Antibiotherapy in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Swiss Emergency Departments: Pragmatic Stepped-wedge Cluster-randomized Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLung ultrasound (LUS) is accurate for diagnosing pneumonia in the emergency department (ED), but standard training is time-intensive, limiting its widespread implementation. We evaluated LUS proficiency for pneumonia diagnosis and perceived adoption barriers after a short training programme.
settingThis study was conducted in the frame of the PLUS-IS-LESS trial (Procalcitonin and Lung UltraSonography-based antibiotherapy in patients with Lower rESpiratory tract infection in Swiss Emergency Departments) (NCT05463406), a pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster-randomised clinical trial evaluating a clinical management algorithm combining LUS and procalcitonin to guide antibiotic use for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in 10 Swiss EDs.
participantsAll medical supervisors (senior registrars and senior physicians) from the participating EDs were invited to go through the PLUS-IS-LESS LUS training programme and all those who completed the training programme were included in this study.
methodsThe training programme included an e-learning course, followed by a half-day on-site training session with theory and hands-on practice. For proficiency evaluation, a validated structured assessment of LUS skills (LUS-OSAUS) was adapted into a 32-question online quiz and five bedside LUS examinations. Success was defined as achieving a score ≥80% on both the online quiz and supervised practical assessment. Success rates were compared between physicians according to their characteristics (age, sex, medical experience, previous use of ultrasound or LUS, linguistic region of work and type of hospital) using a χ² test. A 6-month follow-up survey identified factors associated with non-certification and barriers to the clinical use of LUS for managing LRTIs.
resultsOf 122 trained physicians, 83 (68 %) completed both quiz and supervised LUS and 61 (50%) achieved certification. The most challenging items were pleural line assessment (83% success), recognition of consolidations (83%) and decision-making based on LUS findings (72%). Physicians <40 years had a higher success rate (p=0.009). Among those without complete certification, limited access to an ultrasound machine and low perceived added value of LUS were the main identified reasons. Lack of time was the most frequently reported barrier overall to LUS integration into ED workflows (77%).
conclusionAfter receiving short training and focused proficiency testing, only half of physicians achieved certification, underscoring the challenges of broad LUS implementation. Limited time, equipment access and low perceived clinical value were key barriers, and integrating LUS findings into decision-making remained difficult. Ongoing support, supervision and protected time may be needed to enhance LUS adoption in EDs. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05463406.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.