Observational studyTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
A multicentre, observational prospective study to characterise the use of inhaled triple therapy for COPD: TETRIS final results after a 24-month follow-up period.
Observational study in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04657211 (Triple thErapy in paTients With COPD Under Real lIve Setting), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Triple thErapy in paTients With COPD Under Real lIve Setting (the TETRIS Study)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a global health concern, characterised by exacerbations, worsening outcomes and increasing costs. Real-world studies are essential for understanding treatment regimens and long-term outcomes.ObjectiveTETRIS focused on the impact of triple therapy in managing COPD.Trial DesignTETRIS was a prospective, observational study that enrolled 1,196 patients with COPD from 134 centres who were on triple therapy for at least 2-48 weeks prior to inclusion.MethodsThe primary objectives were to quantify the proportion of patients continuously receiving triple therapy at 6, 12 and 24 months and assess time to discontinuation using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Clinical outcomes and therapy changes were evaluated overall and in subgroups by dosing regimen (once-daily [OD] vs. twice-daily [BID]) and specific single-inhaler triple therapies.ResultsPersistence with triple therapy was 92.5%, 84.4% and 38.5% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Only 10% of patients changed therapy over 24 months. At 24 months, the mean change in CAT sum score since baseline was -4.4 among patients on OD triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI OD). The overall CAT responder rate was 50.1%. Exacerbation and hospitalisation rates remained low throughout the study. The composite endpoint of clinically important deterioration occurred in 53.6% of patients, with lower rates of 45.9% among patients receiving FF/UMEC/VI OD.ConclusionIn this real-world cohort, 38.5% of patients remained on triple therapy at 24 months, and most patients did not require a change in their initial therapy. The steep drop at 24 months was mostly because only few patients remained under observation since the protocol permitted study completion at 18 months, and any patient who dropped out from the study was not censored but counted as patient no longer on continuous triple therapy. These findings support the effectiveness and stability of triple therapy in routine practice and highlight the value of OD single-inhaler regimens in optimising COPD management.Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04657211.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.