Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42710849›Full record

Observational studyTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease

A multicentre, observational prospective study to characterise the use of inhaled triple therapy for COPD: TETRIS final results after a 24-month follow-up period.

Claus F Vogelmeier, Jing Claussen, Kai-Michael Beeh, Peter Kardos, Henrik Watz, Bernd Westermayer, Gernot Rohde

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04657211 (Triple thErapy in paTients With COPD Under Real lIve Setting), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04657211 completednot on this map

Triple thErapy in paTients With COPD Under Real lIve Setting (the TETRIS Study)

TypeobservationalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2021 to 2024Enrolled1,212ConditionsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveArmsProspective observational cohort study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claus F VogelmeierDepartment of Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, German Center for Lung Research (DZL), University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.
Jing ClaussenGSK Deutschland, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8703-0020
Kai-Michael BeehInsaf Respiratory Research Institute, GmbH, Taunusstein, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9067-118X
Peter KardosGroup Practice and Centre for Allergy, Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Red Cross Maingau Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Henrik WatzVelocity Clinical Research Germany, Ahrensburg, Germany.
Bernd WestermayerGSK Deutschland, München, Germany.
Gernot RohdeFaculty of Medicine, Department of Respiratory, Intensive Care and Sleep Medicine, Center for Lung Research (DZL), Marburg-University, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a global health concern, characterised by exacerbations, worsening outcomes and increasing costs. Real-world studies are essential for understanding treatment regimens and long-term outcomes.ObjectiveTETRIS focused on the impact of triple therapy in managing COPD.Trial DesignTETRIS was a prospective, observational study that enrolled 1,196 patients with COPD from 134 centres who were on triple therapy for at least 2-48 weeks prior to inclusion.MethodsThe primary objectives were to quantify the proportion of patients continuously receiving triple therapy at 6, 12 and 24 months and assess time to discontinuation using Kaplan-Meier methodology. Clinical outcomes and therapy changes were evaluated overall and in subgroups by dosing regimen (once-daily [OD] vs. twice-daily [BID]) and specific single-inhaler triple therapies.ResultsPersistence with triple therapy was 92.5%, 84.4% and 38.5% at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Only 10% of patients changed therapy over 24 months. At 24 months, the mean change in CAT sum score since baseline was -4.4 among patients on OD triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI OD). The overall CAT responder rate was 50.1%. Exacerbation and hospitalisation rates remained low throughout the study. The composite endpoint of clinically important deterioration occurred in 53.6% of patients, with lower rates of 45.9% among patients receiving FF/UMEC/VI OD.ConclusionIn this real-world cohort, 38.5% of patients remained on triple therapy at 24 months, and most patients did not require a change in their initial therapy. The steep drop at 24 months was mostly because only few patients remained under observation since the protocol permitted study completion at 18 months, and any patient who dropped out from the study was not censored but counted as patient no longer on continuous triple therapy. These findings support the effectiveness and stability of triple therapy in routine practice and highlight the value of OD single-inhaler regimens in optimising COPD management.Registrationhttps://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04657211.

Indexed as

Adrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsLungMuscarinic AntagonistsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdministration, InhalationAgedDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleAdrenal Cortex HormonesAdrenergic beta-2 Receptor AgonistsBronchodilator AgentsMuscarinic Antagonistschronic obstructive pulmonary diseasemultiple-inhaler triple therapypersistence with therapysingle-inhaler triple therapytreatment adherencetriple therapy

Identifiers

PMID42710849
PMCPMC13554651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.