Observational studyArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Evaluation of a self-administered version of the Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R).
Observational study in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Revised Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale (ALSFRS-R) is a standard tool for evaluating functional decline in patients with ALS. Despite its clinical value, administration by healthcare professionals can be time-consuming and resource intensive. Objective: To assess the reliability and feasibility of a self-administration version of the ALSFRS-R as an alternative for use in clinical and research settings. Methods: The present was an observational, analytical, prospective, single-center study involving ALS patients followed at the Neurology Outpatient Clinic of the Hospital Universitário Onofre Lopes (HUOL). Three independent assessments of the ALSFRS-R were conducted: one self-administered version and two interviewer-administered versions performed by different researchers during face-to-face consultations. Interrater reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and agreement among the three versions was analyzed using Bland-Altman plots. Results: A total of 43 participants were included in the study, with a mean age of 57 ± 11.67 years. The ICCs indicated high reliability for both the total ALSFRS-R score and its functional domains. Linear regression analyses demonstrated strong agreement between the two researchers (R Conclusion: The self-administered version of the ALSFRS-R demonstrated high reliability and strong agreement with the researcher-administered versions, supporting its potential use for remote monitoring of ALS patients. Nonetheless, it should not replace professional assessments in clinical trial settings. Further research is warranted to validate its applicability in broader clinical contexts and diverse patient populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.