ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2026
Comparative Lactylomic Profiling Unveils Dynamic Reprogramming of Post-translational Lactylation Landscapes During Human Sperm Capacitation.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lactylation, a novel post-translational modification involving lactate conjugation to lysine residues, bridges metabolic flux and epigenetic regulation and has emerged as a conserved regulatory mechanism across eukaryotes and prokaryotes, governing cell proliferation, immune responses, and metabolic reprogramming via a "Writer-Eraser" system. Despite the established roles of lactylation in energy metabolism, its function in male reproduction remains unexplored. This study investigates the lactylation modification dynamics during human sperm capacitation, a process requiring metabolic reprogramming for hyperactivated motility. Through 4D FastDIA-based quantitative dynamic profiling, we first conducted the comprehensive characterization of lysine lactylation modifications during sperm capacitation, systematically mapping differential lactylation patterns at the pathway, proteomic, and site-specific levels. We identified 2030 quantifiable lactylated proteins, revealing significant capacitation-dependent modulation: 115 proteins with 133 sites demonstrated upregulated lactylation, while 287 proteins containing 471 sites showed downregulation (p < 0.05, Fold Change >1.5). Notably, 30 proteins exhibited bidirectional regulatory patterns with coexisting upregulated and downregulated sites, and a predominant proportion of modified proteins (263 of 372) displayed single-site differential lactylation. A marked reduction in lactylation levels of mitochondrial respiratory chain proteins was observed after sperm capacitation, indicating heightened ATP requirements. Moreover, proteins with differential lactylation were enriched in biological processes including fertilization, sperm capacitation, β-oxidation, and microtubule dynamics. Strikingly, the presence of known lactylation regulatory enzymes including Alanine-tRNA ligase 1 (AARS1), Sirtuin (SIRT) 2/3, and Histone deacetylase (HDAC) 1/2/6 were detected in the sperm proteome, revealing a 1.6-fold upregulation of SIRT3, implicating its role in delactylation regulation during capacitation. Collectively, these findings delineate a lactylation-coordinated mechanism governing mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation optimization and cytoskeletal architecture remodeling. This work substantiates a trinity regulatory mechanism integrating "metabolism-epigenetics-function" axes through lactylation circuitry, which may have implications for understanding male infertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42710626What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.