ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2026
Tensor-derived diffusion MRI metrics and NODDI in multiple sclerosis classification.
Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMulti-compartment diffusion models and multi-shell acquisitions are increasingly used to overcome limitations of conventional diffusion tensor imaging, but require longer scans and more complex processing. Meanwhile, diffusion MRI classification studies often rely on a narrow set of tensor-derived metrics, especially fractional anisotropy. We investigated whether broader use of tensor-derived features, including shape descriptors, could improve classification without increasing acquisition complexity.
methodsMulti-shell diffusion MRI (b = 0, 1000 and 2000 s/mm
resultsA four-metric set comprising fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, spherical and linear anisotropy reached an AUC of 0.967, above fractional anisotropy alone (0.922) and comparable to the full 13-metric representation. The point-estimate gain was concentrated in linear anisotropy; spherical anisotropy did not increase performance. NODDI showed no advantage at matched dimensionality; single-shell yielded similar point estimates, with no significant difference detected. Removing lesion voxels reduced performance only in white matter, where classification remained well above chance. Free-water correction and adjustment for age, sex and intracranial volume did not improve classification.
conclusionsIn this ROI-based diffusion MRI classification, broader use of conventional tensor-derived information showed similar within-cohort discrimination to more complex representations. Linear anisotropy, computed from eigenvalues already available, adds complementary information without requiring additional diffusion contrasts. These findings support exploiting conventional tensor-derived features more comprehensively before adopting more complex diffusion MRI frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.