ArticlePediatric neurology2026
Perspectives in Conducting Task-Based Research in Pediatric Surgical Epilepsy Patients.
Article in Pediatric neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric epilepsy patients undergoing stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) for ictal onset evaluation provide a rare window to study the developing brain. While methodological frameworks for task-based sEEG research are well-established in adults, pediatric-specific guidance remains underdeveloped. Furthermore, many pediatric epilepsy patients have comorbidities that might typically exclude them from participating in research. We examine factors that influence research participation and discuss considerations for conducting sEEG research in children.
methodsHere, we present a retrospective analysis of task-based research participation patterns from an NIH-funded study of speech and language representations in 66 patients ages 4-24 years undergoing sEEG monitoring at Texas Children's Hospital to determine whether specific comorbidities influenced research participation.
resultsEighty-nine percent (n = 66) of patients approached for consent agreed to participate in the study. Despite high rates of comorbidities including neurocognitive disorder (66.67%), language delay (31.75%), global developmental delay (23.81%), mood disorders (33.33%), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (46.03%), autism spectrum disorder (14.29%), or other cognitive/intellectual disabilities (36.51%), all participants engaged in at least one task. While the majority of these diagnoses did not appear to influence subject participation, global developmental delay was associated with a significant reduction in time spent on active tasks.
conclusionsDespite high prevalence of neuropsychological comorbidities among participants, our evidence suggests that these participants contribute meaningfully to studies investigating important developmental questions. We suggest strategies for tailoring task-based research to accommodate the unique needs of individuals in this population. Such practices are important for ensuring that research studies reflect the true diversity of the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42710395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.